MK supporters at kwaXimba photo facebook

South Africans Divided Over MK Party’s Election Challenge and Parliamentary Boycott

•

The MK Party’s decision has sparked mixed reactions across the country. Some citizens believe Parliament should seek further clarity before proceeding, given the objections raised by the third-largest party.

Parliament just gave this statement of view, but this is our national resources we are speaking of here. Why not seek clarity first after the third largest party’s objection to the sitting?” one concerned South African questioned.

Others argue that the MK Party’s stance is self-serving and disruptive.

The problem with MK is that you guys are selfish. When you say ‘our resource,’ who are you referring to? You are only the third-largest party in the country. You are talking as if you have more votes than anyone,” another citizen remarked.

MK Party to Appeal Constitutional Court Ruling on Zuma Election Eligibility to UN Human Rights Committee

Supporters of the MK Party, however, claim that the IEC and other political entities have conspired to marginalize them.

“Of course, the IEC together with the ANC rigged and stole MK Party votes and then parachuted ANC, DA, and IFP into the top positions to advance their propaganda of forming a GNU, excluding black people from the mainstream economy. ANC never won this election, period!” an MK Party supporter insisted.

On Monday, 10 June 2024, Parliament  acknowledged the MK Party’s formal notice of its intention to challenge the validity of the recent election results declared by the Independent Electoral Commission (IEC).

The party has announced that its 58 elected Members will boycott the first sitting of the National Assembly, citing constitutional concerns over the scheduling of the session.

Jabulani Khumalo Accuses Jacob Zuma of Betrayal and Seeks His Removal from MKParty

Parliament disputes the MK Party’s interpretation of Section 46 of the Constitution, asserting that it is legally obligated to facilitate the first sittings of both the National Assembly and the National Council of Provinces at the Chief Justice’s designated date and time, without any legal hindrances.

According to Section 49(3) of the Constitution, Parliament must proceed with the sittings unless the election results are annulled by a court.

As such, Parliament is arranging travel and accommodation for all members listed by the IEC to attend these initial sessions and onboarding activities in Cape Town.

However, due to the MK Party’s decision to abstain from the first sitting, Parliament has cancelled all accommodation and flight arrangements for the party’s elected members to avoid unnecessary expenses, in line with the Financial Management of Parliament and Provincial Legislatures Act, 2009.

Parliament reaffirms its commitment to upholding its constitutional responsibilities in scheduling the first sittings of the National Assembly and the National Council of Provinces, ensuring adherence to democratic processes and legal frameworks.

 

2 responses to “South Africans Divided Over MK Party’s Election Challenge and Parliamentary Boycott”

  1. […] topstories24.newsJabulani Khumalo, the co-founder of the uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) Party, has been embroiled in accusations and controversies that threaten the stability and integrity of the party. Khumalo, once a central figure in the party, now stands accused of being a disruptive force, or “cancer,” within the organization, leading to fears that his actions could cause members to lose trust in the leadership.South Africans Divided Over MK Party’s Election Challenge and Parliamentary Boycott […]

  2. […] Read | South Africans Divided Over MK Party’s Election Challenge and Parliamentary Boycott […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)

Verified by MonsterInsights